On Women’s Bodies & Violent Men in the ‘Life Is Strange’ Finale

Life Is Strange

[Trigger warning: Discussions of sexual assault and violence against women. Please take care before reading.]

Although it is neither new nor surprising, violence against women in video games still feels more and more like an inevitability. For a game where your narrative choices are supposed to matter, Life Is Strange took the power out of the players’ hands in its final episode, “Polarized.”

Let’s start with where the last episode began. Max was captured by the nefarious—to say the least—Mr. Jefferson, who was revealed to be the true killer of this tale at the end of the fourth episode. In the final episode, the player wakes up strapped to a chair in front of a photographer’s white backdrop located deep in Nathan Prescott’s bunker, otherwise known as the “Dark Room.” The room is dim, save for the blinding professional lights reflecting off of Max’s face. The only thing the player has control over is the camera, where you can scan the room to find your frienemy Victoria tied up and unconscious next to you on the ground in addition to a cart filled with plastic gloves and drugs.

Over and over, you hear the frantic thoughts of Max, who says that she “can’t remember” anything that happened. Eventually, the player uses Max’s rewind powers to relive the moment of Mr. Jefferson standing over her unconscious body with his camera, whispering to himself about the “purity” of Max’s unconscious expression and thinly veiled threats like, “Don’t move, or this will hurt very much.”

At this point, we are supposed to accept with just a few crumbs of plot that Mr. Jefferson is so fixated with getting the perfect subjects for his photographs that he would go to the extreme lengths of kidnapping, drugging, and photographing teenage girls against their will—not to mention murdering multiple kids in his pursuit. We are expected to believe that Mr. Jefferson is simply a depraved man, which, for me, simply wasn’t convincing.

The big reveal at the end of the fourth episode was so shocking and so exciting that I didn’t know what to expect for the final episode. All I knew was that I wanted my questions answered. What drives Mr. Jefferson’s character to commit these crimes? What is his end goal? I get that the world of Arcadia Bay is meant to be fictional to the extent that supernatural powers, alternate timelines, and freak natural disasters occur in simultaneity. So it stands to reason that the fictional drama could do with a dose of psychopathic killer à la your typical horror game. Unfortunately, my questions weren’t answered satisfactorily. Rather, Mr. Jefferson turned into a caricature of a Scooby-Doo villain.

We seem to get the idea that Mr. Jefferson is getting older and is a bit frustrated with Max’s generation (to the point where he made groan-worthy comments about selfies). Internally, he seems jealous of the fact that his time as an artist has passed, though it’s not as if he can get recognition for the photographs he’s taking in the Dark Room without immediately getting himself arrested. So why does he do all of this? Mr. Jefferson reveals that his interest in Max is the pure “innocence” she possesses—which, if you know anything about Max’s character, doesn’t really sound like her. Instead, what we get is Mr. Jefferson’s distorted perception of Max as a young, vulnerable girl and his insistence on having a “connection” with her. And what we’re left with is an implication that the developers wouldn’t directly state in the game: that Mr. Jefferson is a sexually depraved man.

Life Is Strange

While Life Is Strange did not portray scenes of sexual violence explicitly, the Dark Room itself became the metaphorical site of rape that many women and gender variant people will unfortunately—quite literally—experience in their lifetimes. The entire time I was playing the beginning of the episode, I was thinking in my head, when will this be over? This was the same terrifying thought that I had during my own sexual assault. When you play as Max, you are forced to go through what it is like to be tied up, drugged, then violated against your will. I actually felt sick during the entirety of the scene in the Dark Room. Was this the point? Was I meant to feel so disgusted that I no longer wanted to play the game? Am I just too sensitive? Perhaps the only thing that could have made this worse would be if I were experiencing it in first-person mode rather than third-person.

My question is: at what point does this depiction of violence against women slide into fetishism? As if to make matters worse, the game has you use Max’s rewind powers in order to make you go through the experience again (and again and again if you mess up on your rewinds). Despite Max’s horror at having to relive her assault, we as players become forced to hit the rewind button as if we are replaying the cumshot on a porn video. If the dressing of the Dark Room and Jefferson’s camera weren’t already enough to produce the overt “male gaze” of the scene, this matter is doubled by our own voyeurism as players looking in on the scene. Add in Jefferson’s fixation with “innocence” and treating Max like a virginal figure, and the Dark Room is transformed into a visual rape fantasy—albeit a metaphorical one.

Set-ups like this have been the status quo across a wide variety of visual media. In her notable essay, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” Laura Mulvey uses Freudian theory to explain how the structure of cinematography unconsciously serves a patriarchal system of exploitation of women’s bodies. Leaving behind a modern feminist critique of her essay and the dubiousness of Freudian theory in general (for another rainy day, perhaps), Mulvey makes an important point that underscores a certain discourse prevalent in all visual media:

“This is what makes cinema quite different in its voyeuristic potential from, say, strip-tease, theatre, shows, etc. Going far beyond a woman’s to-be-looked-at-ness, cinema builds the way she is to be looked at into the the spectacle itself. Playing on the tension between film as controlling the dimension of time (editing, narrative) and film as controlling the dimension of space (changes in distance, editing), cinematic codes create a gaze, a world, and an object, thereby producing an illusion cut to the measure of desire.”

In other words, the kind of violence portrayed in the Dark Room functions differently than your average strip-tease, where the goal is to make the visual undressing explicit. The Dark Room is an allusion to violence, but it is also an illusion of safety. “True” violence, we’re told, doesn’t happen in front of our eyes, but it could; we (and Max) are “safe” because the game promises us that there’s a way out—but only after we have performed the trauma against ourselves.

These “cinematic codes,” as Mulvey calls them, are a way of hinting at what we can’t talk about (re: sexual violence against women). These visual markers produce tension alongside the narrative, which in turn fosters an erotic gaze towards the scene at hand. That’s our a/illusion of violence—it’s happening, but not really happening. It’s terrifying and horrifying. It’s exciting. The stakes are incredibly high for those of us who have staked a lot of our hearts on this game’s story. Worst of all, we’re expected to experience an unconscious erotic (horrific) pleasure as spectators taking part. Our job is to watch and play along.

Life Is Strange

Perhaps the only redeeming moment of the Dark Room and Max’s capture during Life Is Stranges bizarre finale is that she manages to rescue herself (mostly) without the aid of protagonists who are men, unlike a more common narrative. Max’s powers save her, she triumphs over the numerous bad characters around her, and through our intuition, we get to help her realize this. Agency, right? Max defeats Jefferson and narrowly escapes, but not without sustaining severe emotional and psychological damage as a survivor of manipulation and violence at the hands of men. This doesn’t even mention the bizarro nightmare sequence later on in which Max is literally stalked by all the weird and incredibly violent men in her life. To make matters worse, when Max brings this up to Chloe, they simply state how horrible it was and move on—no processing necessary.

I wait with bated breath for the day that we get to see survivors of trauma and sexual assault in video games actually get to consciously process their trauma as part of the narrative. A spectacular example of a television show that gets this right is the new Marvel series on Netflix, Jessica Jones, created by Melissa Rosenberg. She commented in an article with The Hollywood Reporter recently that:

“For me, if I never see an actual rape on a screen again it’ll be too soon. It’s becoming ubiquitous, it’s become lazy storytelling and it’s always about the impact it has on the men around them … It’s damaging. It’s just hideous messaging, and so coming into this, the events have already happened and this is really about the impact of rape on a person and about healing, survival, trauma, and facing demons. To me, it’s much richer territory.

If you turn on any television show or, for that matter, film these days, nine out of 10 of them seem to open with a naked, tied-up, dead woman with her undies around her ankles. I think I’ve been calling them the NTSDs, which stands for naked, tied-up, dead, I can’t remember. They’ve just become so ubiquitous, it’s like numbing the audience to what is a horrific violation.”

Jessica JonesJessica Jones uses flashing lights, blurred sight lights, and other cinematographic codes to masterfully express visually what it’s like to be sexually assaultednot to mention manipulated and gaslighted by your abuser—and to live with that trauma daily. Where Life Is Strange falls short is how it fails to give Max moments to name her trauma, to talk to other women who have experienced the same trauma, and to work through it. The plot moves on to rewind and “undo” the scene so that it is as if she was never assaulted in the first place, or as if she did not remember it.

Maybe Life Is Strange is making a statement on the state of violence against women. What if we’re meant to feel as though these depictions of violence against women—from Nathan’s initial shooting of Chloe in the school bathroom, to David’s fixation with surveilling teenage girls, to Frank the drug dealer’s violent behavior—are just reflections of our reality? Is this a critical exposé on how we treat women? It’s hard for me to believe that it’s purely just a matter of social commentary. In any case, current examples from visual media such as Jessica Jones are proving that video games can and must do better when it comes to depictions of women, rape, sexual assault, and those stories.

5 thoughts on “On Women’s Bodies & Violent Men in the ‘Life Is Strange’ Finale

Add yours

  1. I recently binged all of the episodes of Life is Strange and here’s my take on it. (Please do not be offended in advance by what I am about to say – it is just my theory based on the plot of Life is Strange and my personal take.)

    I can absolutely see why people who played the final episode would be uncomfortable with the scenes between Max and Mr. Jefferson. However, I think it was necessary for the players to truly understand how horrible of a person he was – and to really understand what Kate went through in order for everyone to empathize with her character.

    Also, the repeating scenes is due to Max’s mistakes with her rewind powers. Just as she was forced to relive the scenes every time she rewinded (throughout the game), naturally we would be too. Was it tasteless for the storyboard designers to take such a horrifying moment in Max’s life and force the repetitiveness of it to the players? That is up to you to decide. I can see why the story segways to making Max go through it over and over again. But it’s also part of the gaming experience and story. This episode is important because it shows how limited Max’s powers are. The moment she has no photos and is physically incapable of rewinding (she needs to be conscious) – her powers are useless. And it’s solidified that the only way she can go that far back in time is if she has a picture she has taken (or does she have to take the picture? Is it enough that she knows what happened in the picture? I wondered about that in the ending if you chose to save Arcadia Bay).

    Personally, I do not think Max was sexually assaulted. Whether or not the game intended to have Mr. Jefferson depicted as a rapist or if the scenery was meant to allude to his victims as being raped without saying it – I do not know. We know that Mr. Jefferson doesn’t kill all of his victims (Kate, Rachel accidentally), and according to his conversation with Max – he liked taking photos of girls losing hope (gist of it). But since Max (and Kate) have no memory of what happened – and no matter how much Max tries – she cannot fully rewind to the point where she was first captured, we’ll never really know what happened to them.

    I do not think this game was meant to display violence against women – it just so happens that the victims were women. Some would say that Nathan was a victim too – but we don’t know what happens to him before he did – he just knows that he will be dead. You gave examples of the game depicting violence against women such as Nathan’s initial shooting of Chloe in the school bathroom. but that’s not because Chloe is a woman – it’s because Chloe was trying to blackmail him for money. David wasn’t fixated on teenage girls – he was suspicious of everyone (including Mr. Jefferson) and looking for possible victims/witnesses/targets. For Frank, you said it yourself – he’s a drug dealer – he’s not going to be a nice guy to anyone who owes him money. (But, he does visits Chloe’s grave even after never experiencing being part of “the Team” and he loved Rachel). But the whole point of the scenery was to evoke a sense of danger and uncertainty – I think the cinematography in the Dark Room served its purpose.

    BUT I will say this, I whole-hardheartedly agree with you that they did not give enough time for Max to process what happened to her. Especially since we know that Max may rewind and may not physically be affected by the Dark Room incident if Mr. Jefferson gets caught early enough – but the mental / emotional trauma still exists. I believe the writers should have invested more in her and Chloe’s interactions when she rewinded back to the beginning of the Vortex party to dissuade Chloe to ditch the party. Max was freaked out about Alternative Chloe – why wouldn’t she talk about what happened to her with Chloe? I would have much rather seen that than her dream sequence / annoying puzzle game of getting past the Mr. Jeffersons. Max has to live with the memories of everything that happens – mentally and emotionally – when she uses her rewind powers. It would have been interesting for the writers to explore that unique consequence of Max’s power in more depth.


    1. I agree with all the above except outside Vortex might not have been the ideal place for a intimate conversation about a recent attempted rape. However, right after that, Chloe and Max go to Chloe’s house although the player skips ahead in time.

      There is no reason for them not to have discussed it there. I mean, perhaps they did, but for the player no such conversation was seen, and this would have also lent even more weight to their friendship and the tenacity of their resolve.


      1. Hello C,

        Thanks for the reply! In response, I didn’t mean to say that they should have discussed the attempted rape (although I don’t think Max was raped) right outside Vortex club. I meant that Max could have used the moment to dissuade Chloe from going in by telling Chloe that what will happen is that she (Max and Victoria – depending on your actions) will be captured (NOT TO MENTION CHLOE WILL DIE T^T). Chloe is capable to of being dissuaded if she saws Max’s raw emotions – that’s the highlight of the moment I wished the writers would have invested in.

        And then of course, follow-up with the scene where they are in the bedroom and Max can process what happened with Chloe.

        But alas, too late now.


    2. I don’t know, I think everyone was able to fully empathize with Kate after realizing she’d been drugged and filmed and shamed and maybe raped and tried to kill herself because of it. It seems a little much to say the only way you can fully empathize with someone is if you go through or at least witness the exact same thing. If that were the case, no one would be able to fully empathize with anyone. Definitely not NECESSARY even if it did clarify what happened to her and fill in the details.

      Saying rewinding multiple times is due to Max’s mistakes and her limitations is the watsonian perspective. It’s why the character has to do it. But we can’t look at that in a vacuum. There’s no reason the game COULDN’T have had the correct photo on the floor within reach the first time. They chose to do that so we could live in excruciating detail Max’s violation.

      Did Jefferson rape her? Doubt it by the time she woke up. She’d be able to tell if he had. Does that mean he wasn’t planning to before she escaped? Not necessarily. Does it make him or what happened any better that he didn’t? Nope. It’s not like he was going to let her go. She saw him murder Chloe and take her.

      “I do not think this game was meant to display violence against women – it just so happens that the victims were women.” Isn’t that the same thing? Oh, it didn’t set out to depict violence against women. It just did. Violence was almost exclusively done against women. Warren was beaten up for involving himself, Nathan was killed because he was unstable and Jefferson was tying up loose ends. Rachel was murdered because she was pretty and popular and desired. Kate was violated because she looked innocent and Jefferson wanted her. Chloe was killed because she was in the way. You can’t say Nathan being killed for knowing too much and being involved with abducting and murdering women is the same as Rachel being killed for just being who she was or trusting the wrong people, let alone his other victims. David was trying to help though going about it in the worst way possible and he was suspicious of Nathan and Jefferson but who is the one he was harassing? Kate, the one going through hell. Nathan seemed to think David was helpful. Chloe wasn’t shot BECAUSE she was a girl, no. But she was still a girl who was shot and it not being because Nathan felt like murdering someone female or because he felt female life was less worthy doesn’t change that. Frank’s not going to be nice to anyone but that doesn’t change that, on-screen, the ones he threatens and harasses are women. Any amount of hypothetical men he mistreats isn’t the issue since we don’t see it and don’t even know for sure it happens even if we can speculate.

      You can handwave all the focus on violence against women using the watsonian perspective but that doesn’t change the doylist one or the fact that it IS focused on violence against women. And it was their story they created from scratch so it was all their choice to do it. There’s no hiding behind “Well but Jefferson’s type was teenage girls” when they make those choices to have that be true.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: